The Park Slope Food Co-op's boycott of Israeli products, Zohran’s refusal to attend this Sunday’s Israel Parade and the accumulating inevitability of justice for Palestine

29 May 2026

Progressive change only ever comes from below, never from above, which means that Israel’s genocide and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians, rollout of apartheid, repeated pogroms, invasions and wars, will only end through an accumulation of trillions of micro-actions. The most important of these can only come from Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon, where the resistance remains steadfast. Iran’s earthquake defeat of two incomparably acquisitive and aggressive colonial-nuclear powers was born as the anticolonial revolution of 1979.

Then there’s the resistance in the west, which might be more modest but definitionally contributes to the trillions of micro-actions required to bring about change—even when it involves relatively privileged food co-op members deciding to boycott Israeli products and a politician deciding not to join this Sunday’s Israel Parade.

The food co-op in question is Brooklyn-based Park Slope Food Co-op, founded in 1973 and one of the largest as well as oldest food co-ops in the US. Every member works a 2.75-hour shift every six weeks. On Tuesday the membership voted to boycott Israeli products by a two-thirds majority despite fierce internal campaigning by a Zionist grouping that argued that such actions (but not Israel’s genocide) are “divisive”. It might seem like a meaningless gesture within the wider story of mass destruction, but it’s not, it’s seismic.

The Park Slope Co-op members resolved that they don’t want to buy olive oil produced on stolen land, sourced from stolen olive trees. They’d rather vomit than purchase several brands of “Israeli tahini” made from sesame seeds that are largely imported from East Africa and South/Southeast Asia. They’d also rather not use Israeli hair care products such as Moroccanoil, which appropriates Moroccan culture, raking in around $750 million revenue in the last financial year.

Still, the primary problem isn’t that Israel is producing fake products that reveal its underlying fake identity—which itself rests on the complete fiction of the Passover/exodus story (see my post on 3 April for a detailed account of this). It’s that Israel has become a narcissistic, psychopathic, sadistic society. Refusing to deal with people or nation states that display these qualities is the only effective way to handle them. The Park Slope Food Co-op has established that it’s possible for such groupings to indeed act ethically.

Zionists—non-Jewish as well as Jewish—responded to the move by alleging that the co-op members are antisemites caught up in a wider tide of antisemitic hatred that aims to eliminate Jews as well as Israel, ie with predictable knee-jerk opposition to everything that isn’t supportive of the needs of Israel’s genocide, ethnic cleansing and apartheid legal structure. They’ve managed to take over the White House, establishment western politicians throughout, western mainstream media organisations, western judges and western corporations. However they’ve failed to take over the minds of human beings who care about the value of human life, irrespective of whether the life in question is Jewish or not, and it was because of this that the co-op voted for the boycott.

The vote led some members to quit—that’s their decision. CUNY Professor of Law and founder of the group SAFE Campus Jeffrey Lax has filed a discrimination complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights—bring it on. The Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, which claims to combat antisemitism, stated: “The Park Slope Food Coop’s vote to adopt a BDS boycott is a deeply disappointing and dangerous outcome. BDS is an inherently anti-Semitic and discriminatory campaign whose purpose is the isolation and ultimate elimination of the Jewish state—and as we have seen time and again, it does not stay contained to Israel”—stop lying. A Zionist posted a note on the front door that read: “Have you looked into products from Italy or are you giving the Vatican a pass for protecting pedophiles? Enjoy your mediocre hummus!!”—they don’t even know that hummus can be traced back to 13th-century cookbooks from Egypt and Syria.

Park Slope happens to be one of the wealthiest neighbourhoods in Brooklyn. It has a long history of housing German, Irish, Italian and Jewish communities. In recent times there’s been a marked revival in the Jewish presence. One of the neighbourhood’s oldest synagogues, Congregation Beth Elohim, has enjoyed a significant revival. Zohran Mamdani visited the synagogue during his mayoral campaign. Some congregants were hostile, others much more open to conversation. When it came to the mayoral election, 77% of Park Slope residents voted for Zohran Mamdani. In New York City as a whole a remarkable 30% of Jewish voters plus 40% of younger Jewish voters cast their ballot for Zohran. The Park Slope co-op members were clearly emboldened by Zohran’s example.

As has been well documented, the Zionist establishment did everything in its power to defeat Zohran’s mayoral campaign by brandishing him as an anti-Zionist (correctly so) and an antisemite (a disgusting slur). During campaign debates moderators who didn’t even pretend to be impartial tried to trip him up by asking candidates which foreign country they would visit first if they were elected. Cuomo and the rest of the treacherous cohort dutifully replied it would be Israel—where else?—only for Zohran to say that he wanted to focus on governing NYC and would look forward to meeting Jewish voters in their synagogues and community spaces. When asked if he believed in Israel’s “right to exist” he answered: “Yes, as a state that respects the equal rights of citizens, as in the US, as in every other state.” Go, Zohran.

Zohran’s mayoral campaign catalysed the underlying dynamic that has played out on repeat since 2015 (when the UK establishment tried to topple Jeremy Corbyn by falsely brandishing him an antisemite—again, he was critical of Israel’s conduct) and 2016 (when the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance published its definition of antisemitism as a means to combat not antisemitism but criticism of Israel). Zionists threw everything at Zohran. Zohran smiled, stuck to a set of solid principles and won a landslide.

Inevitably Zohran has had to make compromises along the way. No mayor can waltz in and change everything at the click of their fingers, especially not the NYPD, while New York City’s embedment in neoliberalism has been firing on all cylinders since 1975. Maybe in some instances Zohran has been so pressurised into demonstrating his anti-anti-semitism that he’s overcompensated. We saw this with Jeremy Corbyn and more recently in the UK we’ve seen it with Zack Polanski’s Greens. We see it constantly, because the Zionist penchant for ganging up on any expression of criticism is relentless. Overall, though, Zohran has been resolute in his support for Palestinian justice, as always seemed likely.

Zohran’s example has been inspirational. During his campaign he outlined how, if elected, he would reconfigure the city’s relationship with Israel on the basis that it was breaching international law on numerous counts, the ICC had issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, and the ICJ had confirmed as early as January 2024 that early evidence indicated that it was “plausible”—ie believable—that Israel was perpetrating a genocide, the gravest crime known to humanity. He explained why this would be beneficial for New York as a city.

Since becoming mayor he has made three interrelated moves—introducing a series of changes into the running of City Hall, marking of the Nakba and refusing to participate in this Sunday’s Israel parade—that illustrate he is serious. The feverishness of the Zionist backlash confirms that he’s on the right track.

Zohran, a one-time rapper, hasn’t missed a beat. On 1 January 2026, his first day in office, he revoked all executive orders issued by the previous incumbent, Eric Adams, hardcore Zionist, after 26 September 2024. This included the order that barred city employees and agencies from boycotting or divesting from Israel. After all, if there had been international support for the boycott of apartheid South Africa, why shouldn’t there be a boycott of Israel, whose escalating crimes have been exponentially more grievous? Zohran also revoked an order that expanded the city’s definition of antisemitism and promised to reissue the order that regulates the Office to Combat Antisemitism (aka the Office to Combat Criticism of Israel).

Zohran followed up in March when New York City officials removed a webpage from the New York City Economic Development Corporation website that showcased the city’s economic, business and cultural relationships with Israel. Adams, corrupt to the core, had created the page in the first place.

Zionist leaders and activists cried antisemitism because nothing can override Israel’s rights—to not only “exist” (no country has a right to exist) but to commit a genocide, grab Gaza and the West Bank at will, bomb and invade whichever country it chooses, and ignore every ceasefire agreement it signs while insisting the other signatory abides by it to the letter, all without criticism and consequence. A few months into Zohran’s term a friend forwarded me a link to a Jewish-Zionist social media thread where participants claimed that they’d never felt so threatened as Jews. They did this even though Zohran hasn’t issued a single threat against a Jew or taken on a Jewish person merely because they’re Jewish. He merely sought to reduce the control of a foreign, Israel/Zionist-supported grouping over City Hall and allow New Yorkers—including Palestinian New Yorkers—to express dissent.

Zohran followed up on his initial moves two weeks ago when he became the first NYC mayor to honour Nakba day. He posted a video that featured a woman called Inea, a Palestinian New Yorker and Nakba survivor whose family fled Jerusalem in 1948. In the video Inea recounted how she had lived in England and then Italy, only to be treated like an alien in both countries. But in New York she felt properly welcomed and “most at home” thanks to its thanks to its diversity. Zohran stated: “Today marks Nakba Day, an annual day of remembrance to commemorate the expulsion of more than 700,000 Palestinians between 1947 and 1949 during the creation of the State of Israel and the year that followed.”

The howls of antisemitism that followed were predictable, hyperbolic and tone deaf. It doesn’t matter how many times anyone explains that criticism of Israel isn’t an expression of hatred for Jews, that for two thousand years Jews didn’t aspire to have a nation state, that today many Jews believe that Israel is a net negative force for Jews, etc, the Zionists refuse to listen.

Before the genocide I happened to be in therapy with a psychotherapist who had a Jewish dad and identifies as a Jew (fine by me). After 7/10 I found myself having to deal with Jewish-Zionist friends who were dropping me because I was calling for a ceasefire and using the word “genocide”. He believed that the friendships were breaking down because I wasn’t prepared to properly listen to what these friends were saying. I tried to explain: no, I’m listening to them, I don’t like what I’m hearing, but these friends are dropping me, not vice versa. After a while he said he wanted us to have session in which I would sit and listen to him give his side of the Zionist story. I said, OK, I’m not paying for it, but I’ll make sandwiches. On the given day, my therapist offered a largely standard account of the history of Zionism and why in his view it’s not a colonial project. I basically sat and listened to him as he subjected me to his story in a way that I never subjected him to my story, nor any friend, nor anyone I know. At the end I explained why I didn’t agree with a number of his comments. It was amicable enough but at the end of it all I realised that he’d been ready to completely trash the therapeutic relationship—crossing every boundary known to the profession while refusing to listen to me, his client—in order to project his views on me. The sessions limped on for a few more weeks—enough for me to explain how trust had been broken. Then he texted me an article about an Israeli ex-general who said that the invasion of Gaza should be opposed because it was bad for Israel, which he thought I’d like. In the next session I asked him: isn’t this guy aware that the genocide is also bad for the Palestinians? Then I quit.

A more extreme and, for me, novel form of Jewish-Zionist refusal to listen emerged during the fallout from Zohran’s commemoration of Nakba Day. At a press conference one questioner asked him: don’t you think that by marking Nakba Day and emphasising the displacement of Palestinians you’re being insensitive to Jews who experienced displacement by Nazi Germany? Are you just making them feel that they can’t even think of New York as a safe home?

If I’d been standing in Zohran’s shoes—and to be honest just polishing them would be one of the highlights of my life—I would have responded with the following argument. Yes, the Holocaust was one of the great tragedies of the twentieth century. My dad escaped Nazi Germany on the Kindertransport, just a month before the outbreak of World War Two, so I’m familiar with the seriousness of this history. Yet the Jews were able to finally able to win international support for the creation of the State of Israel on the back of the Holocaust, so they do have somewhere to go if they need to flee persecution. New Yorkers also live in a city where antisemitism—when it’s real and not criticism of Israel—isn’t tolerated. What’s more, Jews with a German heritage can also claim German citizenship. So there are three safe countries that New York Jews with a German heritage can reside in safely, two if they’re not German. How many countries can the Palestinians live in safely?

An aside: following Brexit I occasionally thought about applying for German citizenship so I could enjoy Eurozone privileges regarding freedom of movement. It was never a big deal and wasn’t something I ever pursued. Then, early into the genocide, I discovered that if I applied for German citizenship I’d have to swear allegiance not only to Germany—which would have been bad enough—but also to Israel. So that was the end of that.

Zohran’s response was far more intelligent. He didn’t play the game of explaining just how important it is to fight antisemitism and make sure that Jews are safe. He didn’t attempt to demonstrate his anti-anti-semitism credentials by noting that on Holocaust Remembrance Day on 27 January the German genocide “calls on us to do more than reflect; it calls on us to act to confront antisemitism wherever it exists and to reject all forms of hatred.” Nor did he note that on 24 April he’d acknowledged the Ottoman Empire’s genocide of the Armenians. He didn’t even bother to explain that criticising Israel is not the same as criticising Jews, and that 60 percent of US Jews believe that Israel has perpetrated war crimes and 40% believe it has perpetrated a genocide. He understood that whatever he said would be completely ignored or misinterpreted. So he simply repeated why it was important to mark the Nakba for the first time in mayoral history.

In this way Zohran avoided feeding the narcissist, who demands attention, even if the attention is negative, because negative attention is better than no attention at all. No amount of attention is ever enough, which is why, during the last two years, there’s been exponentially more talk about Israel’s right to defend itself, the heroism of the Israeli-Jewish hostages and prisoners-of-war, misinformation about Hamas and the rise of antisemitism (much of it criticism of Israel) than about the actual genocide (which never gets discussed without Zionist qualification).

In other words, Zohran refused to turn Nakba Day into a discussion about antisemitism along with the ultimate dead cat distraction tactic: Israel’s right to exist/defend itself. At least on that one day, he wanted to address something else, if that was permissible (not that he used such passive-aggressive language). Bravo.

Third, also in mid-May, Zohran announced that he wouldn’t participate in the Celebrate Israel Parade, which prides itself of being “the world’s most significant expression of solidarity with the Jewish state”. Every New York mayor prior to Zohran had joined in the “celebration”, which dates back to David Ben Gurion’s visit to New York in 1965. Zohran, however, calculated that as a human being who lived in a supposedly free society he wasn’t required to do something he didn’t believe in, and had never pretended he believed in. So he said: I won’t be celebrating the subjugation of the Palestinian people.

The facts of Israel’s creation are quite simple. More than 750,000 Palestinians from a total population of 1.9 million were made refugees between 1947 to 1949. Despite massive financial assistance in the run-up to the creation of the State of Israel, Zionists still owned less than six percent of the land. By the end of the Nakba, Zionists had seized more than 78 percent of historic Palestine. Along the way they ethnically cleansed and destroyed approximately 530 villages and cities. They also killed some 15,000 Palestinians in a series of mass atrocities that included more than 70 massacres.

Not often discussed, the very creation of Israel was illegal on several counts. The UN’s General Assembly didn’t have the authority to pass a binding resolution, so didn’t have the authority to create Israel against the will of the Palestinian majority. Article 181 merely recommended that Jewish and Arab states should be created. It added that the Jewish state could only be legitimate if an Arab state was created alongside it. After that the Zionists unilaterally declared the establishment of the State of Israel. Instead of honouring Article 181 they executed the Nakba. “After the formation of a large army in the wake of the establishment of the state, we will abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine,” declared Ben Gurion.

There’s something sadistic about forcing someone to do something against their will. It’s about demonstrating power, superiority and control, and rests on humiliation. The Zionists wanted to force Zohran to celebrate Israel in the footsteps of Ben Gurion. They were absolutely insistent he should do this in the midst of a genocide. They couldn’t contain their horror when he declined.

This total lack of self-awareness and empathy signifies a personality disorder, a form of psychopathy. I don’t support Zionism but can see that if I peer to the far reaches of the Zionist spectrum that there are some Zionists out there who are more reasonable than others. A number of them write for Haaretz. Omer Bartov, the Dean’s Professor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Brown, is another. In his new book, “Israel: What Went Wrong?”, he charts how Israel, founded in the aftermath of trauma, became the perpetrator of trauma by embracing an extremist ideology. There are many points on which I disagree, but I can at least see that Bartov is trying to work out why things went so catastrophically wrong and how they might be set right. Sadly, within the Zionist movement, he’s part of a tiny minority, many of whom won’t even dare to squeak.

A psychologically balanced Zionist can only conclude that any public expression of sympathy for the Palestinians—including their right to drink water, eat food, access medication, grow crops, go fishing, live in a building on a land where they are the indigenous people—would amount to a form of political intelligence. Even if it made the Zionist in question feel a bit uncomfortable, or attract some intra-Zionist criticism, it would help convince the wider world that Zionism can operate differently. If enough Zionists joined in they might finally turn Isarel into a country that can negotiate an agreement with the current Palestinian leadership, which, after all, supports a two state solution. But instead of showing even a modicum of understanding, or even joining the protest against the genocide, the standard Zionist response is to cry antisemitism and express just how afraid they are—and their fear trumps everything.

A couple of years ago I stumbled into an Israel Parade completely unawares. I’d travelled to New York for a few days to attend a dear friend’s one-day exhibition at MoMA. It was a big deal and I wanted to be there for him—and for me. On the day of the show I found myself trying to cross a Fifth Avenue that was awash with tens of thousands of Zionists waving the Israeli flag. I’d never seen anything like it, not remotely. For a short while I joined the Chassidic counter-demonstration and soaked up all sorts of abuse. As I tried to find a way into MoMA, which wasn’t in the least bit straightforward, I got into a few arguments along the way. It was a complete waste of time—the Zionists were in a triumphal mood that day and pointed their fingers at me as they rolled out the usual denials and accusations. Close to the MoMA entrance I found myself surrounded by Zionist partygoers; eventually my friend’s representative saw me and more or less dragged me out. It had taken me an hour to complete a walk to MoMA that was supposed to take five minutes. I can’t remember the last time I felt so uncomfortable.

It’s a wonder that the Jewish god didn’t convey an eleventh commandment to Moses: thou shalt support the creation of Israel and defend it without fail. OK, as I learned on Passover earlier this year, there’s zero evidence the Israelites were slaves in Egypt—the Egyptians were renowned for keeping extremely detailed records and there’s no record of Israelite slavery. Nor is there any evidence that the Israelites spent forty years walking through the desert. This has been confirmed by numerous archaeological studies. But Zionists often discover a latent religious belief when they claim that god promised Israel to the Jews plus Israel has become their new religion. They behave like no other nationalist grouping I’ve ever witnessed. For the average Zionist, “thou shalt celebrate Israel” has evidently become way more important than “thou shalt not kill”.

The reality is we’re facing a fanatical nationalist cult. Some don’t go around behaving in a fanatical way but when it comes to Israel there’s no way to shake their undying support, whatever Israel gets up to. Something like 90 percent of Israeli-Jewish citizens support Netanyahu’s policies in Gaza, the West Bank, Iran, Lebanon and Syria etc—even as a growing percentage are fed up that he hasn’t been more effective. The Zionist movement and lobby are applying the same logic throughout the West and have notable control of the establishment in the US, Germany and the UK, with Australia, Canada, France and Greece not far behind. In fact Greece is right up there but lacks clout.

A few weeks ago Natasha Hausdorff, the spokeswoman for UK Lawyers for Israel, went on LBC radio to discuss Israel and, as she had it, antisemitism, with Owen Jones. Hausdorff insisted, wild-eyed, that everything Own was saying about Israel amounted to misinformation and lies spread by antisemitic propagandists. Among its advocacy work, UK Lawyers for Israel has challenged the Starmer government’s suspension of 30 arms export licenses to Israel—even though the UK has also exported three times the number of weapons to Israel (including F-35s) as the previous arch-Zionist Conservative government. The group has also opposed the ICC’s arrest warrant against Netanyahu. Nothing whatsoever can be tolerated that promises to stop Israel acting with impunity.

Meanwhile Spanish Flotilla activists who’d been literally raped and tortured in Israel returned to Bilbao, only to be viciously beaten up by the police as they exited customs control. The scenes were shockingly violent:

It quickly emerged that the Spanish police force has several multi-million pound contracts with Israeli security forces, who are training them in surveillance, crowd suppression and counter-terrorism. In other words, the Spanish police were simply following Israel’s advice, tactics and possibly instructions. Clearly Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez, one of the most outspoken critics of Israel’s genocide, lacks control over his police force.

In addition to torturing Flotilla activists and raping Palestinian prisoners—yesterday the UN formally added Israel to the list of countries that perpetrate sexual violence in conflict—Israel has accelerated its genocidal killing spree in Gaza and Lebanon (where it’s openly repeating the Gaza playbook) these last few days. Netanyahu has also announced that he now wants to seize 70 percent of Gaza, having completed the takeover of 60 percent. In response Mark Carney, Emmanuel Macron and Keir Starmer issued a joint statement calling Israel’s Gaza offensive “wholly disproportionate” and threatening to take “concrete actions” if Netanyahu didn’t halt the offensive. In response Netanyahu accused them of “emboldening Hamas to continue fighting forever”—his way of thanking them for doing absolutely nothing while enabling him to keep the genocide going.

Only Spain and, to a lesser extent, Ireland have broken with this mutual backscratching routine. Yesterday the EU introduced sanctions on a handful of entities and individuals perpetrating settler violence in the West Bank—including the maniacal settlement pioneer Donna Weiss. Israel’s Foreign Ministry responded by accusing the EU of a “blatant political vendetta”. What’s blatant is the role Germany has played in preventing Spain, Ireland, Slovenia and the Netherlands from suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement. Meanwhile the repression of the solidarity movement is only accelerating in Germany, the UK and the US.

It’s easy to feel helpless in the face of the monotone normalisation of the genocide as well as the repression of resistance, all in the name of combatting antisemitism. Have we ever been told a more sweeping, unified, vile lie? And for what? To prop up Europe’s last colonial outpost?

Yet the tide of history, consistently misreported in the corporate media, promises that the US-EU-Israel axis is being bypassed and superseded. The Israel First war on Iran has completely failed. The political alliances of West Asia are being redrawn in real time. The US has no future in the region as the Gulf states absorb Trump’s complete failure to defend them. Israel will soon be completely isolated save for its alliance with the treacherous UAE. Chinese leader Xi Jinping evocation of the Thucydides Trap during his welcome to Trump captured the scale of China’s rise and the US’s imminent fall perfectly. The surging China/Russia/BRICS alliance, Iran’s emergence as the world’s fourth superpower, and this wider grouping’s fast-evolving relations with African and Asian countries are compounding the decline of US-Euro influence.

There’s no way Israel can survive these epochal geopolitical shifts in its current form, yet it might self-combust before they play themselves out. A rejuvenated Hezbollah is inflicting huge losses on the IDF in Lebanon, with the Israeli military unable to handle Hezbollah’s FPV fibre-optic drones. Two days ago the Israeli parliament announced a $700 million fund to work out how to respond—meaning they’re facing unsustainable losses and haven’t got a clue what to do. Despite its attempt to wipe out Gaza, Israel has not been able to disarm Hamas. The self-defined Jewish state wants to complete the genocide but doesn’t know how. The IDF is overstretched, exhausted and suffering from mass PTSD. No fascist or para-fascist society can survive indefinitely. Failure is built into fascism. The regimes in Argentina, Chile, Germany, Italy and Spain all eventually collapsed. Israel will go the same way.

It’s our moral duty to help bring about Israel’s collapse as soon as possible. Poll after poll confirms that support for Israel has collapsed in the US, including within Jewish constituencies—meaning that it’s a matter of time (two, ten, twenty years?) before the county reins in its financial and military support for Israel. Throughout Europe political parties that have backed Israel are in a state of irreversible collapse while those that have taken a stand are on the rise. The solidarity movement continues to attract hundreds of thousands of protests to every demonstration while the Israel-backed, far right English Defence League has become a laughing stock. A week ago London mayor Sadiq Khan, who has generally been silent on the genocide, cancelled a proposed £50 million AI “intelligence” contract with Palantir (which works for the IDF). Artists, musicians and audiences majorly disrupted the Eurovision Song Contest and the Venice Biennale festival, refusing to validate Israel’s culture-washing participation. Eurovision’s ratings plummeted. When the ICJ eventually delivers its verdict on the genocide—probably in late 2027/early 2028 thanks to Israel’s perpetual delaying tactics—Israel and its supporters will finally be forced to face consequences for their actions.

Within this context the Park Slope Food Co-op’s decision to boycott Israeli products amounts to another example of determined resistance. So does Zohran’s decision to mark Nakba Day and not join the Israel Parade. These and countless other daily acts are contributing to the trillions of micro-actions needed to bring about change. Every action on every level counts and accumulates. The more of us who contribute, the more we contribute, the sooner we can move beyond the tech/military/oil/banking/media corporate takeover of the west.

Israel and its corrupt establishment backers want us to believe they’re hegemonic, that there’s no alternative. But they’re not because hegemony rests on consent more than force, and consent for Israel has collapsed. Palestine and every human being connected to the struggle for justice will benefit from the overthrow of the status quo. It’s easy to be appalled, disheartened and depressed. But the resistance will never die, the decline of the US can only hasten the decline of Israel, and this can only end in one way.

🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸 Free Palestine! 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸