Zionist false flags and empty ambulances

27 March 2026

Whenever Trump starts to worry that his electoral base won’t be happy about his decision to represent Israeli rather than US interests in Iran, Israel tries out a new trick to suck the US deeper into its messianic conquest. This comes off the back of Israel’s takeover of the White House, as recently detailed by Jason-Bourne-style US patriot Joe Kent in his must-see interview with Tucker Carlson, conducted after Kent, previously a Trump supporter, resigned as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center over the mindbogglingly idiotic war on Iran. The one thing zionists and antizionists agree on is that Israel has dragged the US into the war on the basis that this will be its last chance to pull of such a planet-shattering stunt—Trump is becoming weaker, the Democratic support for Israel is in decline, US popular support for Israel has crashed, even the Deep State is backing away etc. Israel is therefore flying as many false flags as it can manage to drag prevaricating actors into the war. Even the arson attack on British Jewish ambulances earlier this week appears to have been one such false flag, for fuck’s sake.

It’s hard to even say where the false flags begin when discussing a fake country that has relentlessly manipulated the legacy of the Nazi Holocaust and weaponized antisemitism to the point where it’s become an all-consuming mirage. Given its tiny size, Israel has clearly been more effective than the US when it comes to establishing neocolonial control over foreign governments and corporations, with both countries devoting themselves to maximising their global influence ever since 1945 and 1948 respectively. With both Israeli and US power on the brink of collapse, the lashing out has become wilder than ever. Both countries are applying the strategy tested on Gaza to devastate Iran and Lebanon. They also want Gulf Cooperation Council and European states to join in.

Earlier this month Israel attacked oil facilities in Saudi Arabia (the Aramco Refinery) before claiming the attack was carried out by Iran, except there’s no evidence of this while Israel is desperate for Saudi Arabia along with Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, etc to join its war against Iran. Israel is also believed to have used copies of Iran’s Shahed-136 drone to attack civilian infrastructure in Iran’s neighbours in order to further persuade them to join the Israel First war on Iran.

At the end of last week the UK-US Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean was attacked hours before UK ministers met to discuss the Israel First war on Iran. Israel’s military chief, Eyal Zamir, claimed that Iran used “a two-stage intercontinental ballistic missile with a range of 4,000km.” He added: “These missiles were not intended to hit Israel. Their range reaches the capitals of Europe. Berlin, Paris and Rome are all within direct threat range.” Why anybody would believe anything an Israeli military chief says after two-and-a-half years of genocide denial and the attempt to manipulate the entire western world into supporting the genocide is beyond me. Yet at the meeting the UK agreed to let the US use its military bases to attack Iranian missile sites.

The whole episode screamed of the claims made by war criminals Blair and Bush during the invasion of Iraq that Saddam was in possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction and posed an immediate threat to the West. For 24-48 hours the media was obsessed with the idea that Iran would attack the UK! But Nato couldn’t confirm that the missiles were Iranian, the US refused to make a statement blaming Iran for the attack, and even the UK has shifted from blaming Iran to saying it doesn’t believe that Iran has the capacity to launch such attacks.

So if Iran isn’t responsible for attacking Diego Garcia who else could possibly want to drawn the UK and US deeper into the war? The name of the overwhelmingly likely culprit begins with “I” and rhymes with “hell”.

Then earlier this week there was an arson attack on four Jewish charity-owned Hatzola ambulances in north London. As if touched by a Zionist wand, the story of this “horrific” and “appalling” “antisemitic” attack became an international news story Keir Starmer jumped in, exclaiming his “horror.” Starmer’s primary partner-in-war-crimes, hardcore Zionist Attorney General Richard Hermer, commented: “These vehicles exist to save lives—to serve everyone in our community—and targeting them is not only a criminal act but a hateful one. Antisemitism has absolutely no place in our society. This attack is an attack on all of us, and I stand in full solidarity with those affected.” This is what makes Hermer such a devastatingly brilliant AG: he’s able to forensically argue that ambulances exist to SAVE LIVES while saying nothing about Israel’s systematic attack on every hospital and ambulance during its genocide of the Palestinians and its barbaric attack on Iranian civilians since its war on Iran began.

UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting upped the hysteria by describing the incident as a “shocking, cowardly, and despicable act of evil,” introducing incendiary language that he, too, was completely unable to locate during Israel’s systematic, two-and-a-half year obliteration of Gaza. Far-right reform leader Nigel Farage joined the parade, declaring: “The horrible attack on volunteer ambulances is part of a rising tide of hate against Jewish communities in Britain.” Yes, forget about Israel’s nonstop psychopathic genocidal conduct, Jewish-Zionists are the ones who are really suffering here and are most in need of protection. The simple fact they’ve collectively been unable to offer any public criticism of Israel is beside the point. Four EMPTY ambulances were set on fire. What could possibly be more TRAGIC than that?

Along the way folks who’ve dared criticize Israel’s genocide, including the excellent and bold leader of the Greens, Zack Polanski, have been quick to condemn the ambulance attack as a “disgusting” example of antisemitism. That’s because Israel’s critics have been hammered so hard for naming and opposing Israel’s genocide they feel a need to distance themselves from anything that could even conceivably be antisemitic and do so very publicly. I understand why, especially given the way the UK zionist establishment conspired to bring down Jeremy Corbyn on false allegations during the sustained attack of 2015-19. Except—did the arson attack on the four ambulances have anything to do with antisemitism?

It turns out the four ambulances that were attacked were due to go out of service. The attack happened in a period of high ambulance demand yet they remained inactive with no crews on standby-weird. The Jewish Chronicle arrived at the scene very quickly indeed, so might have been given a prior warning. What’s clear is the JC posted a video of the attack timestamped at 2:46-am on 23 March and had filed a detailed, 1,250-word report replete with interviews by 8:10am the same day, which is really quite impressive even if even the reporter had been pro-warned and was waiting on the spot! The scene was soon occupied by thuggish young Zionist men, the likes of whom we’re seeing way too much of these days, who harassed and hurled racist abuse at an al-Jazeera journalist when he arrived. The JC didn’t find space in its account to mention the behaviour of the racist Zionists.

Activist, rapper and Double Down News investigative reporter Lowkey reports that the group that went on to supposedly claim “responsibility” for the attack, Harakat Ashab al-Yamin al-Islamia, referred to Palestine as “the land of Israel”, which is complete giveaway that the declaration was falsified because Israel’s opponents don’t use that terminology at all, they might refer to Israel as the state of Israel but normally refer to it as Palestine. Lowkey adds that the group’s statement appeared in both English and Arabic, which is another giveaway given that Iranians largely speak Farsi.

(Although the genocide has been indescribably grim the sheer inadequacy and stupidity of the zionist propaganda machine has added a touch of macabre humour.)

Doing the kind of research that journalists who work for the mainstream media in the UK are either incapable of carrying out or are forbidden from carrying out, Occupy London add that Harakat Ashab al-Yamin al-Islamia didn’t even exist until a month ago, at which point “it suddenly appeared fully formed and started causing small incidents of property damage to Jewish communities in Belgium and the Netherlands. From day one of its appearance, Israeli-backed think tanks and security groups instantly claimed to have linked it to Iranian militias.”

Independent journalist Craig Murray points out: “The notion that the Iranian state would discredit itself by choosing to attack an ambulance service in London is crazy. Iran has not even attacked any hospitals or ambulances in Israel. Iran has absolutely zero record of attacks on healthcare facilities.” Craig adds that the attack just so happened to take place hours before Metropolitan Police Chief Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley was due to address a fundraising event for the Community Services Trust, “the group which receives enormous payouts from the British Treasury for consistently exaggerating the scale of antisemitism in the UK.”

It should also be noted that Iran has no problem whatsoever with the Jews. Max Blumenthal conducted an excellent documentary on Iran’s Jewish community that includes several interviews with Iranian Jewish leaders who explain their deep embedment in the country historically, culturally and also politically (where their rights of Jews and Jewish representation in parliament are enshrined), Iran is clear that its enemy is zionism and Israel, not the Jews. Pretty much the last thing Iran would want to do right now is attack a symbol of Judaism given that it wants Jews to extricate themselves from Zionism.

Nevertheless the corporate media, from the BBC to the Guardian to the Daily Telegraph, were unable to contain their own HORROR at the eruption of yet more fake antisemitism in the UK because they much prefer to report on fake antisemitism than Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians, the illegal Israeli First war on Iran and the spiraling instances of Islamophobia in the UK.

One thing that’s repeatedly striking with these red flags and reporting in general is that there’s no pause to wait to see if any evidence might emerge to demonstrate that a crime has been committed that might be antisemitic in nature. Starmer was a high-flying human rights lawyer and head of the Crown Prosecution Service before he entered politics. Hermer was also a high-flying human rights lawyer and is now the most prominent lawyer in the UK, the ultimately representative of the legal profession. Yet neither Hermer nor Starmer have shown any interest in due process because they only care about defending Zionism. Hermer owes his position entirely to Starmer. Starmer’s whole campaign to become Labour leader post-Jeremy—which he based on false claims that the Labour party was riven with antisemitism, by which he meant actual Jews who were critical of Israel—was funded by hardcore Zionist Sir Trevor Chinn, which Starmer of course failed to declare.

Don’t be deceived. Starmer is not the kind of person who cares about human beings, not if they don’t serve his political interest. When he was questioned about US missiles hitting the girls’ school in Minab, murdering (via incineration) 175 schoolgirls plus their teachers, he said he was “concerned”. He didn’t have anything to add when it was confirmed that the missiles that struck the school were US missiles. Which just goes to show what a disgusting specimen of a sub-human being Starmer really is.

If there’s no feasible explanation or motive for Iran or a pro-Iranian grouping to have carried out the ambulance attack, and if there’s no evidence of antisemitism, who could have possibly gained from such an act other than Israel and its increasingly psychopathic supporters?

Meanwhile is there any chance that the Guardian or the BBC or the New York Times any other mainstream journalistic outlet might ask some questions, conduct some minimal research or even do some kind of investigative reporting as they go about their work during a time of heightened crisis that revolves around Israel’s expansionist war? Don’t make me laugh.

It’s not as though the Jewish community even lost anything as a result of the ambulance burning. All four vehicles would have been mandatorily insured, so a claim can be made, which isn’t a bad outcome given that they were apparently due to be taken out of service anyway. Wes Streeting immediately provided the Jewish community with four replacement NHS ambulances, all paid for courtesy of the UK taxpayer. Meanwhile the two suspects who were arrested following the arson attack have been released on bail, indicating there’s no suspicion of “terrorism”, which all but rules out the hypothesis that the culprits were Iran-aligned.

So yes to the fight against actual antisemitism, yes to contextualizing any instance of actual antisemitism within the calamitous reality of genocide, Israel’s deadly invasion of Lebanon and its demented war on Iran, which is going to have massive repercussions for the planet, especially the poor. But no to the use of fake, non-antisemitic antisemitism to distract the world from Israel’s genocide while calling for special treatment for Jewish-Zionists.

I find it quite demeaning to say in these situations that I’m writing as a Jew because I’ve always considered myself to be a human before I’m a Jew, but in these treacherous, warped times, it seems to be useful. I promise you all it’s perfectly possible to be critical of Zionism and not be in the least bit antisemitic.

Stop the war on Iran, free Palsetine, love and solidarity

xx